![]() but its been 74 years since then and society has evolved concepts have evolved and i dont blame the special marriage act 1954. ![]() we will not be treated as lesser mortals and there will be full enjoyment of right to life. I am saying let there be a positive affirmation and since we have been held to be equal starting for NALSA and Navtej then there should be marriage should be equal. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi: I am equal to heterosexual groups and it cannot be so that their sexual orientation is correct and all others are incorrect. if one mans fundamental right is affected he has a right to approach the court in navtej also the miniscule minority point was overruled. Courts have always struck down the argument that even if one person is impacted then an action is struck down. I have no representation in the parliament and that is why it is the courts we come to. it deals with the public confidence which wrests on this court You are dealing with something which is beyond the normal. British influence prevailed since they made the laws and those victorian model was imposed society has existed in the shifting sands of time. You go to Khajurao and the sexual acts are depicted there for thousands of years. decriminalising was the first step and affirmative steps remain which will help me lead a dignified life like any other person but court commented on it that centre should have taken a stand. in Navtej centre in affidavit had said that they leave it to the court. state should come forward and say that they accept gracefully. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi: Every facet of life where we face pitfalls should end. ![]() is the second head and the third one is molding and tailor the remedy which is effective on the ground Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: Non discriminatory inclusion is first head, the notice being sent under Special marriage act regime. Justice SK Kaul: We have to get used to finish cases in time bound matter because there are other cases also. it is not that you have longer time to decide it. Justice SK Kaul: Absolute outer limit is today.Ĭhief Justice DY Chandrachud: Something from bench to bar. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: Some matters are evolving and there are questions by the bench. nowhere in this country can arguments go on indefinitely. Justice SK Kaul: See you have experience in this court. saying in points is a virtue that you are putting against me. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: This is a matter of some moment. I will finish by tomorrow lunch time.Ĭhief Justice DY Chandrachud: Please wrap it up today Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: I will not repeat 95 per cent of submissions made by Mr Rohatgi. Justice Ravindra Bhat: If you see Justice Ramaswamy judgment then such things can be done even with a direction without us getting into all of this. Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswamy: How marriage is defined by the court will impact these changes. Justice Ravindra Bhat: Not totally horizontal. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: I am talking about a group insurance. do they use such expressions or are left loose. so u have IRDA regulations or there are standard policies. Justice Ravindra Bhat: Say insurance like family insurance etc are subject to regulations. Justice Hima Kohli: I was about to say this.Ĭhief Justice DY Chandrachud: If a couple is in gay or lesbian relationship can still adopt, so the entire argument LGBTQ couple raising will impact children is belied since either of the gay or lesbian can adopt.just that the child loses the aspect of parenthood. Justice SK Kaul: Some people get separated to get tax benefits. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi: I don't marry because i want to get a tax benefit. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |